MARCH 2000
CLINICAL
PRACTICE GUIDELINE for UNSTABLE ANGINA/NON-Q-WAVE
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
ENDORSED
BY:
CHIEFS OF CARDIOLOGY
CHIEFS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
HOSPITAL BASED SPECIALIST PEER GROUP
CHIEFS OF MEDICINE
INTRODUCTION
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
from unstable angina to
acute myocardial infarction are the leading cause of morbidity and
mortality
in the United States. There are 6 million emergency room visits for
chest
pain each year in the United States with 650,000 yearly hospital
admissions
for unstable angina with 2% to 10% of these patients developing a
myocardial
infarction with a 2% to 5% 30-day mortality rate. In addition, there
are
750,000 yearly admissions for acute myocardial infarction. A
patient
presenting with unstable angina or a non-Q-wave MI has a 10% chance of
developing a Q-wave MI or dying. The six-month mortality rate of ACS
patients
with ST depression is 9%, for ACS patients with T wave inversion the
mortality
rate is 3% and for ACS patients with ST elevation treated with
thrombolytics
the mortality rate is 6%.
In
October 1998 TPMG released an evidence-based
Clinical
Practice Guideline for evaluating the possibility of ACS in patients
presenting
with chest pain and a guideline for the treatment and management of
patients
with an Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). TPMG clinicians
and other
health care
professionals are
strongly encouraged to review
these Clinical Practice Guidelines as they provide extensive
recommendations
on evaluating and managing these patients.
The
purpose of this guideline is to address
treatment
strategies in the present era of new therapies and serum cardiac
markers
for patients with definite or confirmed ACS without ST elevation, who
therefore
are possibly at high or intermediate short term risk for AMI or death.
This Unstable Angina/Non-Q-Wave MI Clinical Practice Guideline bridges
the gap that currently exists between the Chest Pain and AMI guidelines
presently in use.
Numbers within each bar represent number of
patients with
troponin I levels at each range.
Reprinted'with permission from
N Eng J
Med V335(8)
pg 1347
UNSTABLE
ANGINA/NON-Q-WAVE
MI: INITIAL EVALUATION & PATHWAY
*
For initial evaluation of
patients with possible ACS,
clinicians should refer to Clinical Practice
Guidelines for
Evaluating Acute Coronary Syndrome
in Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department, published
by TPMG.
*ACS patients with ST elevation of 0.lmv (1 mm if
ECG
done at standard scale of lmV= 10 mm) or greater in 2 or more
contiguous
leads and in cases of suspected MI and left bundle branch block are
candidates
for reperfusion therapy (thrombolytics or primary PTCA). Clinicians
should
refer to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Myocardial
Infarction
published by TPMG for managing these patients.
*Patients
with definite ACS based on clinical
presentation
or ACS confirmed by dynamic ST segment shifts, deep T-wave inversions,
ST depression, hemodynamic abnormalities or positive cardiac markers
should
be treated according to the Acute Ischemia Pathway.
SERUM CARDIAC
MARKERS
Serum cardiac
markers,
particularly creatine kinase (CK),
have long been used as indicators of myocardial necrosis. Serum CK-MB
Mass
has improved
sensitivity for the
diagnosis of MI within the
first 6 hours. Cardiac-specific troponins, troponin-T and troponin-I,
are
macromolecules that
are not detected in the
blood of healthy individuals,
and thus offer improved specificity for the detection of myocardial
necrosis.
A substantial proportion
of patients with
ACS but no myocardial infarction
based on normal serial CK-MB Mass have elevated troponins indicating
focal
myocyte necrosis.
An elevated troponin
level has been shown to
have additional prognostic significance beyond that supplied by such
other
means as the clinical
characteristics of
the patient, the ECG, and
a pre-discharge exercise test. In particular, elevated troponin-I and
troponin-T
levels identify patients at increased risk of death. Furthermore, there
is a quantitative relationship between the level of elevation and the
risk
of mortality in those patients
presenting with an
acute coronary syndrome (Fig.
1). However, clinical experience around KP Northern California has
documented the
presence of normal
coronary arteries in some patients
despite the presence of elevated troponins. Current data suggests
presence
of renal failure, myopericarditis, or cardiomyopathy may cause false
positive
troponin elevations.
Measurement
of both troponin I and CK-MB Mass provide
complementaiy information in the evaluation of intermediate and high
risk
patients with
possible ACS. Troponins also are clearly helpful
in patients presenting more than 24 hours after onset of symptoms as
they
remain elevated
while
CK-MB levels may have normalized. Also ACS patients
without ST elevation and an elevated troponin exhibit a greater benefit
from newer antiplatelet
or antithrombotic therapies, such as platelet
glycoprotein llb/llla inhibitors and low molecular weight heparin. Thus,
in patients with
definite or confirmed ACS a single troponin
I measurement should be strongly considered (in conjunction with CK-MB
Mass) in the Emergency Department and another measurement repeated 8-12
hours after admission. The guideline team highly recommends facilities
that currently do not have troponin I processing capabilities work
toward
making it available as troponin I offers the clinician added prognostic
value for the management of the patient with ACS.
Given the time
frames of the release of serum cardiac markers, it is important that
clinicians
consider the time of onset of symptoms when interpreting the results of
serum cardiac marker measurements. The diagnostic accuracy can be
improved
by obtaining serial measurements over several hours. (See the Chest
Pain
Guidelines for recommendations of a diagnostic strategy for use in
chest
pain observation units.)
Unstable
Angina/Non-Q-Wave
MI:Hospital Course
Health Care Access
Patients
suspected of having ACS should be triaged
to
a designated cardiac care level Emergency Room, observation unit,
Transitional
Care Unit/Step
Down Unit, or
Critical Care Unit bed with continuous
monitoring of the ECG, oximetry, and non-invasive blood pressure. The
initial evaluation
of
patients with ACS must exclude patients
with pain due to active peptic disease, pulmonary embolus, and aortic
dissection
for which
some of the
following therapies are contraindicated
and potentially life-threatening.
Oxygen
Pulse
oximetry or an arterial blood gas (ABG)
should be
used for assessment of systemic oxygenation and supplemental
oxygen prescribed if
indicated.
Nitrates
Sublinglual,
topical, oral spray, or intravenous
nitrates
are indicated for initial management of ischemic cardiac pain in ACS
for
all patients if the systolic blood pressure is over 90mm Hg. Patients
should be asked about recent sildenafil (ViagraÔ)
use as the combination of ildenafil and organic nitrates (nitroglycerin
and nitroprusside products) can lead to severe and prolonged
hypotension.
It appears that patients will remain at risk for a serious drug
interaction
for 24-72 hours after administration of sildenafil (ViagraÔ),
depending upon patient age, and renal and liver function. Careful
attention
to the use of nitrates with inferior and right ventricular infarction
patients
is required due to the possibility of
decreasing preload and
causing severe hypotension.
Analgesics
If
the response to oxygen and nitrates is
inadequate,
administration of intravenous morphine sulfate, meperidine, or fentanyl
should be considered early in adequate doses to relieve pain, to reduce
stress and hypertension, and to reduce the high circulating
catecholamines
in response to the pain from ACS. The drug dose requirements may vary
widely
depending on the severity of the patient's acute pain.
Anti-platelet
therapy
Antiplatelet agents are indicated in all patients
with
ACS who are without contraindications to anti-platelet
therapy, which
may include known hypersensitivity to the drugs below, active
gastrointestinal
or other bleeding, or known severe hemorrhagic diathesis.
These drugs
should be administered expeditiously.
*Aspirin
(soluble 162 mg - 325 mg PO daily) is the
antiplatelet
agent of choice for all patients with ACS. Enteric coated products
should
not be used for the initial dose in order to achieve rapid biologic
effects.
*Clopidogrel (Plavixâ):
In aspirin allergic patients use clopidogrel 75 mg PO daily (375 mg PO
loading dose may used). A loading
dose achieves more rapid
biologic activity against platelets.
Ticlopidine (Ticlidâ) use is discouraged
due to its rare but life threatening
adverse side effects,
including granulocytopenia and
thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP).
*Aspirin
and clopidogrel may be
prescribed together
in patients being considered for urgent catheterization and
Percutaneous
Coronary
Intervention
(PCI).
Pretreatment with aspirin (soluble
162-325 mg PO) and clopidogrel (375 mg PO loading dose and 75 mg PO
clopidogrel daily or 75 mg PO
clopidogrel daily without
loading dose) reduces complications of the PCI procedure. Clopidogrel
may
increase
the
risk of bleeding with
subsequent coronary bypass
surgery (CABG) and the advantages and disadvantages of antiplatelet
drug
therapy
should
be carefully considered
based on the clinical
information available and the probability of requiring urgent CABG.
Beta-blockers
Beta-blocker therapy is indicated in all patients
with
ACS with the exception of patients with decompensated severe heart
failure,
cardiogenic shock,
severe reactive airway
disease, or significant
bradycardia (heart rates less than 50 bpm). Beta- blockers reduce
subsequent
risk of death,
myocardial infarction,
emergency catheterization,
and requirements for revascularization in all patients with ACS. There
are several options for drug
administration:
*
IV atenolol (Tenormin) 5 mg IV repeated by
another 5
mg IV in 10 minutes, and followed by 25-100 mg PO daily or
*a IV metoprolol (Lopressor) 2-5 mg doses every 5
minutes
to 15 mg total dose, and followed by 25-100 mg PO 2 x day or
*Oral therapy: In lower acuity situations for
patients
with ACS oral initiation of therapy with beta-blockers is appropriate.
Atenolol
25-100
mg PO daily is
recommended or metoprolol 25-100
mg PO BID or
*Severe instability: IV esmolol loading
dose and
infusion may be considered with severe clinical instability. IV esmolol
is an ultra short acting beta-blocker
that requires a
loading dose and constant
infusion, which must be titrated to the desired clinical effect.
Esmolol
therapy generally begins with a 500 microgram/kilogram bolus over 1
minute
followed by a constant infusion of 50 micrograms/kilograms/minute for 4
minutes. If a satisfactory response is not obtained, the bolus is
repeated
before each sequential step-up in infusion rate through 100, 150, and
200
micrograms/kilograms/minute
.
Patients on stable outpatient
regimens of beta-blockers
should continue their outpatient drug and dose if there are no
contraindications.
Anti-thrombin
therapy to be in addition to aspirin
or clopidogrel
Antithrombin
therapy (Unfractionated Heparin or
Low Molecular
Weight Heparin) is to be used in addition to aspirin or
clopidogrel
in all
eligible ACS patients.
Contraindications to
anti-thrombin therapy include
active clinical bleeding, recent surgery, recent stroke, acute
head
injuries as part of a complication of ACS (syncope),
and proliferative diabetic retinopathy with hemorrhage.
Heparin therapy
is
generally
continued for 24-48 hours or until stabilization,
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), or CABG. Patients already
anticoagulated with
warfarin (Coumadinâ)
need special attention. The warfarin is usually discontinued and either
unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin (Lovenoxâ)
is substituted.
Patients with known hypersensitivity to heparin (heparin induced
thrombocytopenia)
should be considered for therapy
with lepirudin rDNA (RefludanÔ).
Low
Molecular Weight
If
no immediate catheterization
or use of glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa receptor blockade is intended, LMWH is the anti-thrombin
choice
for patients with ACS. Safety and efficacy trials
for the combination
of LMWH and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade are ongoing.
Currently there
are inadequate data to
promote their combined use.
Enoxaparin (Lovenoxâ) should be administered
as lmg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours. If premixed syringes are used,
doses can be rounded to
the nearest syringe size based on the patients body weight in Kg
(40,60,80,
and 100 mg). Enoxaparin
has been shown to
have a favorable ratio of
antifactor Xa: antifactor II activity compared to other LMWH products
currently available.
TIMI II B and the
ESSENCE trials provide the
evidence that early weight adjusted enoxaparin will not only reduce
death
and MI but also
the need for
revascularization in suitable selected
patients (duration of therapy in these trials ranged from 2 to 8 days).
While it appears that the risks of major hemorrhage are approximately
the
same as unfractionated heparin, the risks of minor hemorrhage is
slightly
increased with enoxaparin. The
therapeutic benefits
supporting the introduction
of enoxaparin in ACS clearly outweigh the increased risk of minor
hemorrhages.
Enoxaparin is easier to administer than
unfractionated
heparin and requires no PTT monitoring and can achieve therapeutic
anti-thrombin
levels within 30 minutes of administration. Enoxaparin should be
discontinued
4-6 hours prior to scheduled catheterization or 12 hours prior to
scheduled
CABG.
For patients with significant renal impairment
(e.g. creatinine
clearance < 30cc/min), factor Xa levels should be monitored to
adjust
the dosing of enoxaparin.
Since this is not
practical unfractionated
heparin is the agent of choice in these patients. Enoxaparin also
should
not be used for
patients with body weight
> 120 Kg due to a lack
of dosing guidelines.
Most
patients with ACS will become clinically
stable with
medications and will not require emergency catheterization. When
catheterization is
scheduled, the last dose of
LMWH should be 4-6 hours
prior to the procedure. During catheterization careful attention should
be paid to the
timing of the last dose of
LMWH, since the aPTT and
activated clotting times (ACT) will not reflect LMWH heparin
anti-factor
Xa activity. If LMWH
was given within 8 hours
of cardiac catheterization,
a vascular closure device is recommended or one should wait 8 hours
following
the last LMWH dose to remove vascular sheaths. LMWH can be restarted 2
hours after vascular closure, if clinically appropriate. No
adjustment to vascular access
management is required
if catheterization is performed after 8 hours from last enoxaparin
injection.
If PCI is performed
and LMWH was given
6-8 hours prior to PCI,
then 2,000 units of unfractionated heparin should be given with a lower
targeted ACT of 150-200 sec. For detailed information on enoxaparin,
refer
to the P&T formulary section of the National Pharmacy intranet
site
at http:\\pharmacy.kp.org
or contact KP
Drug information at 8-345-2340.
Unfractioned
heparin
If
immediate catheterization or
use of glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa receptor blockade is intended, unfractionated heparin is the
anti-thrombin
choice for patients with ACS. Unfractionated heparin is also the agent
of choice for ACS patients with significant renal impairment (e.g.
creatinine
clearance < 30cc/min), and for patients with body weight
>120 kg.
Unfractionated heparin may be used with an intravenous loading doses
and
maintenance infusions with a therapeutic goal of an activated partial
thromboplastin
time (aPTT) 1.5-2.0 x control. Monitoring is required for
heparin-induced
thrombocytopenia (HIT). One should consider lepirudin rDNA
(RefludanÔ)
use for ACS and CABG patients requiring anti-thrombin therapy with
prior
HIT.
If use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade
is intended
unfractionated heparin with a modified loading dose and infusion should
be considered. There
are a number of heparin
dosing regimens for unfractionated
heparin and there is no consensus on the best regimen, although reduced
doses are required when used
in conjunction with glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa receptor blockade to minimize bleeding complications:
*Weight adjusted heparin dose: Heparin bolus of 60
U/kg
followed by 12 U/kg/hour for 48-72hrs (with a maximum of 4000 U bolus
and
l000U/h infusion for patients weighing > 70 Kg). Weight adjusted
heparin
dosing is likely to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation without
overshoot
or undershoot of
the aPTT goal
(1.5 to 2.0 x control or
between 50 and 70 sec). The lower end of the aPTT goal should be the
objective when
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
receptors are used.
*Low
and ultra low dose weight adjusted heparin:
low dose
heparin bolus of 60 U/kg IV followed by 7-12 U/kg/hr or ultra-low dose
of 30 U/kg followed by 4 U/kg/hr are under investigation when used in
conjunction
with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and may be considered
alternatives
to the weight adjusted regimen above in selected patients.
* Non weight adjusted heparin administration is
not recommended.
Platelet
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa)
receptor
blockade
Three
drugs have been approved for use as
intravenous
agents for blockade of the platelet IIb/IIIa glycoprotein receptors and
inhibition of platelet
aggregation and
activation in patients with
ACS: eptifibatide (IntegrilinÔ, KPformulary)
(PCI and ACS), tirofiban (Aggrastatâ,
KP non- formulary)
(ACS), and
abciximab (ReoproÔ)
(PCI). These three drugs are quite different structurally from each
other
and have different indications
and dosing.
Contraindications for all three agents include:
Active
bleeding, recent surgery, diabetic hemorrhagic retinopathy, renal
failure
(creatinine
>
4.0 mg/dl or chronic dialysis), platelet
count < 100,000, pregnancy, recent head trauma, intracranial
arteriovenous
malformation or
tumor, pericarditis, uncontrolled
severe hypertension, aortic dissection, or recent non-hemorrhagic
stroke
or
any
prior hemorrhagic
stroke. In hemorrhagic emergency,
or should surgery be required, all three drugs should be discontinued.
Fresh platelet transfusions
will reverse the
antiplatelet effects of
abciximab but will not reverse the antiplatelet effect of eptifibatide
or tirofiban. The simple discontinuation
of
eptifibatide or tirofiban infusion
however will lead to return of normal platelet function in 4 to 6 hours
due to the short half life of these
drugs. Monitoring of
platelet counts along with
the hematocrit is required with utilization of the GP IIIb/IIIa
receptor
blockade to monitor for the
presence of bleeding and
also for the possible risk
of thrombocytopenia which occurs in 1 to 2% of patients treated with
abciximab
but much less with
eptifibatide or
tirofiban. For detailed information
on eptifibatide refer to the P&T formulary section of the
National
Pharmacy Intranet
site at
http:\\pharmacy.kp.org or contact KP
Drug information at 8-345-2340.
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade in ACS
patients
with ST depression > 0.5 mm; T-wave inversion > 5 mm;
transient and
resolved ST
elevation; elevated troponin or CK-MB
Mass; or prior diagnosis of CAD by catheterization, PCI, CABG, MI, or
positive non-invasive
imaging: These patients are
at higher risk of MI, death, or urgent revascularization and should be
considered for GP IIb/IIIa
receptor blockade in
addition to aspirin, beta-blockers,
nitrates, and heparin.
Glycoprotein llb/llla receptor blockade in ACS
patients
without ST elevation or depression and with normal troponin or
CK-MB Mass: This
is a subgroup of the ACS
patients who are at lower risk for MI, death, or urgent
revascularization.
GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade
should be considered
for these lower-risk patients
only when there are refractory symptoms and a prior diagnosis of
coronary
artery disease
by catheterization,
PCI, CABG, MI, ETT or positive
non-invasive imaging study. Risk-benefit ratios should be considered
when contemplating
GP IIb/IIIa
receptor blockade in lower-risk
patient populations. In the absence of ST segment changes
great care
is required to exclude aortic
dissection andgastrointestinal hemorrhage/
peptic ulcer disease prior to initiation of therapy.
Eptifibatide (IntegrilinÔ,
KP formulary) or tirofiban (Aggrastatâ,
KPnon-formulury):
GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade
drugs have been studied
in randomized ACS clinical trials. These are cyclic peptides and
nonpeptides
which cause reversible
short acting
platelet receptor IIb/
IIIa blockade for use in ACS patients according to manufacturers
loading
dose and infusion guidelines
and continued for
48-72 hours or until discharge.
Both can be continued through catheterization and PCI but must be
stopped
prior to CABG. Dose
reductions for eptifibatide during PCI
were initially recommended by the manufacturer to reduce vascular access
bleeding, but there
is data that insufficient platelet
inhibition occurs with this dose modification and it is therefore not
recommended. Dose
modifications (135
mcg/kg/min over 1-2 min followed
by to 0.5 mcg/kg/min continuous infusion) are required for renal
impairment (creatinine
2.0 to 4.0 mg/dl).
Eptifibatide is contraindicated
above a creatinine of 4.0mg/dl.
*
The loading dose for eptifibatide is 180 mcg/kg
given
IV over 1-2 minutes followed by an infusion of 2.0 mcg/kg/min for up to
72 hours
or
hospital discharge. The
dose of the infusion may be
reduced to 0.5 mcg/kg/min at the time of PCI to reduce vascular access
site
hemorrhage
but the lower dose
may not provide for adequate
platelet inhibition.
*The
loading dose for tirofiban is 0.4
mcg/kg/min
for 30 minutes with a maintenance infusion of 0.I mcg/kg/min. The use
of tirofiban
is
suggested
only in
those patients received in transfer
from another medical center where therapy was initiated with tirofiban.
Currently
there
are no safety data on
conversion from tirofiban
to eptifibatide therapy available.
*When
patients receive eptifibatide or
tirofiban
are referred for catheterization and PCI, the drugs should be continued
through PCI for
another
12-24 hours. Careful
vascular access management
is required. Venous sheaths and catheters should be discouraged to
reduce
hemorrhagic
complications.
Abciximab
(ReoproÔ
): For
the purposes of these guidelines abciximab
is not recommended currently for the management of patients
with ACS
outside of the
catheterization laboratory. Eptifibatide
(IntegrilinÔ) is the preferred formulary
GP llb/llla inhibitor for this indication. The role of abciximab in AMI
with ST elevation is currently
under investigation.
Continuum
of care through catheterization and PCI
Since
KP members may undergo a number of
inter-facility
transfers between community hospitals, KFH hospitals, and KFH or
community hospitals
with catheterization
and PCI facilities careful
consideration of the use of GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade is mandatory.
Clear communication
of the drug
used, loading and maintenance
dose infusions, and other agents must be made. There are no safety or
efficacy
data on using
combinations of the
three GP IIb/IIIa drugs
during PCI. Therefore consideration should
be made for continuing the
initial GP IIb/IIIa therapy
through catheterization and PCI according to the manufacturer's
recommendations.
Intra-aortic
balloon counterpulsation
*As
part of the
PCI/Cath/CABG
pathway in centers with PCI and CABG on site:
Intraaortic balloon
counterpulsation is an invasive and
highly effective therapy for refractory angina in the ACS patients.
Experienced centers with the
full range of fluoroscopic,
angiographic, cardiovascular surgery, and vascular surgery support may
use
IABP
counterpulsation for
patients with refractory ACS
to the above therapies. Careful case selection is required to avoid
peripheral
and
abdominal complications.
*As
part of the ACS pathway in centers
without PCI
and CABG on site:
In
CCU settings in centers
without catheterization, cardiovascular
surgery, and PCI facilities transfer of the patients refractory to the
above ACS guidelines to a
tertiary care facility should
be considered. IABP is an appropriate consideration as a part of a
comprehensive
treatment
plan for patients
with ACS refractory to aspirin,
oxygen, nitrates, beta-blockers, antithrombins, and GP IIb/IIIa receptor
blockade. Use of IABP
counterpulsation requires a fully
integrated team of physicians, CCU nurses, and a hospital with
experienced
biomedical
support staff.
Thrombolytic
therapy
Currently
there is no evidence for efficacy or
safety
of thrombolytic therapy in patients with ACS without ST elevation or
new
LBBB.
Therefore
the use of
thrombolytic agents (streptokinase,
urokinase, tPA, rPA, reteplase, APSAC) is discouraged in patients not
meeting
the Acute Myocardial
Infarction
guidelines for thrombolytic therapy.
Angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitors
Angiotensin
converting enzyme (ACE) can play an
important
role in the management of ACS patients with hypertension, or an LVEF
less than
40%, or for management of
congestive heart failure.
They are not routinely indicated for the therapy of ACS in the absence
of hypertension, CHF,
or low LVEF. Angiotensin
II receptor blockade, such
as losartan
(Cozaarâ,
KP-non-formulary)
maybe considered in patients for whom ACE inhibitors are indicated, but
not tolerated due to cough.
Calcium
channel blockade
Calcium
channel blockade particularly with short
acting
nifedipine without beta-blockade may have adverse effects inpatients
with
ACS.
Addition
of a long acting
calcium channel blockade for
anti-ischemic therapy in patients on maximally tolerated doses of
beta-blockers,
aspirin, nitrates,
heparin, and
platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockade
may be considered for individual patients with ACS. The majority of
benefit
of calcium channel
blockade has been
demonstrated for patients with
chronic stable angina by improvement of exercise tolerance and a
decrease in
angina frequency. Primary
studies of calcium
channel
blockers in ACS have been disappointing. Patients
intolerant of beta-blockers or with contraindications to their use
(bradycardia,
active asthma, severe decompensated CHF) may benefit from the addition
of calcium channel blockade for therapy of the ACS:
*Nifedipine-long
acting (Adalatâ):
Short acting nifedipine should not be used in the ACS setting. Use long
acting preparations with caution in
patients who are not
beta-blocked due to reflex tachycardia.
The starting dose is 30 mg daily and may be titrated up to 90-120 mg PO
daily.
*Verapamil: Use either long acting (240-480 mg PO
daily)
or short acting (oral doses of 80-120 mg TID-QID). Enhanced drug
interactions with
beta-blockers, digoxin, or amiodarone
may cause profound bradycardia.
*Diltiazern:
Use either long acting (120-360 mg PO
daily)
or short acting (oral doses of 30-90 mg QID). Enhanced drug
interactions
with
beta-blockers,
digoxin, or
amiodarone may cause profound
bradycardia.
*Felodipine (Plendilâ),
KP non-formulary): 5-10 mg PO daily may be effective in patients with
low
ejection fraction.
RISK
STRATIFICATION OF THE PATIENT WITH
UNSTABLEhttps://kaiserpapers.com/downey/cajue/heart/
ANGINA
Hospitalized
patients with acute coronary syndrome
free
of angina and CHF for a minimum of 24 hours should be considered for
stress
testing.
A
treadmill exercise test is
appropriate for patients
who can exercise without exhibiting LVH, LBBB, IVCD, digoxin effect, or
ST-T wave abnormalities on the resting ECG. When ECG abnormalities are
present, a thallium sestamibi stress test or stress echo should be
performed.
For patients unable to exercise, a persantine or adenosine thallium may
be considered. With asthma or wheezing, a dobutamine or adenosine
thallium-sestamibi
nuclear study or dobutamine echo may be substituted. Angiography should
be considered without stress testing in patients with ischemia
associated
with CHF, definite ECG changes such as a non-Q wave myocardial
infarction
or ST depression, new or worsening MR, S3 gallop, ST segment shifts or
LBBB. Patients who fail to stabilize with medical treatment resulting
in
recurrent ischemia at low level of exercise are also candidates for
angiography.ACS
patients with prior revascularization with PCI within the past year or
prior CABG surgery may be
candidates
for prompt
angiography without stress
HOSPITAL
DISCHARGE & DISCHARGE CARE
Long
Term Medical Therapy
Please
refer to the AMI guideline for specific
details.
Recommendations for ACS patients include: low fat diet; aspirin (ASA)
81-325
mg
daily in the
absence of
contraindications or clopidogrel
75 mg daily if ASA allergic or intolerant; beta-blockers in the absence
of
contraindications;
and lipid
lowering agents in patients
with LDL cholesterol >100. ACE Inhibitors are appropriate if
patients have
depressed ejection
fraction (EF)
< 40% with or without CHE
Discharge
Instructions
Follow-up
appointments should be encouraged as
follows:
medically treated and revascularized (PTCA/CABG) patients should be
seen
in 2-3
weeks and higher risk
patients in 1-2 weeks. Medication
instruction (to include verbal consultation with a pharmacist) to the
patient
and/or designated caregivers must be user friendly. Patients should be
advised to discontinue any use of sildenafil (ViagraÔ)
until cleared by their physician.
Additionally the patient
should be instructed to contact
their physician if the pattern of symptoms changes (increase in
frequency
or severity, precipitated
by less effort,
or occurring at rest or
during sleep) to determine the need for additional treatment. Specific
instructions should be given to appropriate
patients regarding
smoking cessation, weight
loss, daily exercise, low fat diet, hypertension control, and blood
sugar
regulation.
Discharge
instructions should
also include referral to
the MULTIFIT or an alternative cardiac rehab program. The use
of "Post
MI Doctor's Discharge
Orders"
developed by the MI guideline team
is strongly recommended.
SPECIAL
GROUPS
Women:
Women with ACS are
generally older with
greater comorbidities than men, have more atypical presentations, and
appear
to have less severe
and extensive CAD. They
less frequently receive
aspirin and undergo angiography, but have similar use of exercise
testing,
and the same prognostic
factors as men.
Current data indicates that
they should be managed in manner similar to men, although it should be
recognized that the presentation
may be more
atypical and both stress ECG
and thallium perfusion imaging are less accurate. When available stress
echo can be an alternative
choice. Women who
have never been on hormone
replacement therapy (HRT) should not be started on it during the first
year post ACS.
If
they are currently on HRT
it may be continued. After
the first year post ACS, women should be started on HRT only after
discussions
of personal risks and benefits.
Elderly
Patients: The elderly
with ACS tend to
have atypical presentations of disease, substantial comorbidities, ECG
tests that are more difficult to interpret,
and different
responses to pharmacologic agents
compared to younger patients. When all cardiac and other comorbidities
are considered, they
can be approached in a
manner similar to younger
patients with attention paid to altered pharmacokinetics and
sensitivity
to hypotensive drugs.
The indications for
angiography and revascularization
are similar to those in younger individuals. Overall, decisions on
management should
reflect considerations
of general health status,
patient preferences and life expectancy. Advanced directives should be
reviewed and discussed.
Diabetes Mellitus: Diabetes is
present in about
one-fifth of ACS patients and is an independent predictor of adverse
outcomes.
This should be taken
into account in the
initial evaluation of patients
with ACS. Diabetes is associated with more extensive CAD, unstable
lesions,
frequent comorbidities,
and unfavorable
long-term outcomes with
coronary revascularization, especially with balloon PTCA. In caring for
diabetic patients with ACS, attention should be directed toward
comorbidities,
including peripheral vascular disease, LV dysfunction, CHF, and
autonomic
neuropathy with altered anginal threshold. Patients with ACS and
diabetes
show a particularly strong benefit in improved outcomes with adjunctive
treatment with GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade.
Post-Coronary
Artery Bypass Graft
Patients:Post-CABG
patients who present with ACS are at higher risk with more extensive
CAD
and LV dysfunction
than previously
unoperated patients. Medical
treatment should follow the same guidelines as in the non-post-CABG
patients.
Repeat
revascularization can
be performed and is effective
on the post-CABG patient, though it is more difficult technically and
results
in higher post-operative
mortality. Due
to many anatomic possibilities
that might be responsible for recurrent ischemia, there should be a low
threshold for angiography
in patients
post-CABG with ACS.
Cocaine
Use: The incidence of
MI in patients entering
an ED with chest pain after cocaine use is very low when the initial
ECG
is normal or has nonspecific
changes. These
patients should be carefully
evaluated and appropriately treated, as the use of cocaine is
associated
with a number of cardiac
complications that can
produce myocardial ischemia
presenting as an ACS (e.g. coronary artery spasm, coronary thrombus,
dysrhythmias, accelerated
coronary atherosclerosis).
NTG and calcium channel blockers are the preferred drugs in cocaine
induced myocardial
ischemia and
vasoconstriction as both NTG
and verapamil have been shown to reverse cocaine induced hypertension
and
coronary arterial
vasoconstriction.
SELECTED
ACRONYMS
*ACS:
Acute Coronary Syndrome
*ACT:
Activated Clotting Time
*ASA:
Aspirin
*CABG:
Coronary Artery Bypass
Graft Surgery
*
CAD: Coronary Artery Disease
*CCU: Critical Care Unit
*CHF: Congestive Heart Failure
*CK-MB Mass: Myocardial
Fraction of Creatine Kinase
*
ECG: 12-Lead
Electrocardiogram
*EF:
Ejection Fraction (Left
Ventricle)
*ETT:
Exercise Treadmill Test
*GP
IIb/IIIa: Platelet
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor
Blockade
*HRT:
Hormone Replacement
Therapy
* IABP:
Intra-Aortic Balloon
Pump
*IVCD:
Interventricular
Conduction Defect
*LAD:
Left Anterior Descending
Coronary Artery
*LBBB:
Left Bundle Block Branch
*LMWH:
Low Molecular Weight
Heparin
*LV:
LeftVentricular
*LVH:
Left Ventricluar
Hypertrophy
*
MI: Myocardial Infarction
*MR:
Mitral Regurgitation
*
NTG: Nitroglycerine
*PCI:
Percutaneous Coronary
Intervention
*
PTGA: Percutaneous
Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty
* PTT: Partial Thromboplastin
Time
Selected References
1999,
ACC/AHA Guidelines for Unstable Angina
(currently
in draft).
1999,
ACC/AHA Guidelines for
AMI (available online
http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines).
TPMG: Acute Myocardial
Infarction & Chest Pain Guidelines
(http://clinical-library.ca.kp.org).
TROPONINS
Ohman EM, et al. Cardiac
troponin T levels for risk stratification
in acute myocard/httpdocs/cajud/heartial ischemia. GUSTO HA
Investigators. NEngl JMed
1996;335(18):1333-134l.
Antman
EM, et al.
Cardiac-specific troponin I levels
to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary
syndromes.
NEnglJMed
1996 ;335(18):1342-9.
LMWH
Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel
EP. A comparison of low
molecular weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable
coronary
artery disease. ESSENCE Trial. NEnglJMed 1997;337:447-452.
Antman EM et al. Enoxaparin Prevents Death and
Cardiac
Ischemic Events in Unstable Angina/Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction
Results
of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIB Trial
Circulation.
1999;100:1593-1601.
Mark
DB, Cowper PA, Berkowitz SD, et. al. Economic
assessment
of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus unfractionated
heparin
in acute coronary syndrome patients: results from the ESSENCE
randomized
trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q wave
Coronary
Events [unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction].
Circulation
5-5-98;97(17):1702-1707.
Klein
W, Buchwald A, Hills WS, et. al. On behalf
of the
FRIC investigators. Fragmin in unstable angina pectoris or in non-Q
wave
acute myocardial infarction (FRIC). Am J. Cardiol
1997;80(5A):30E-34E.
Swahn
E,WallentinL. For the FRISC Study Group.
Low-molecular-weight
heparin (Fragmin) during instability in coronary artery disease
(FRISC).
Arn J. Cardiol 1997;80(5A):25E-29E.
GP
IIb/IIIa
The
PURSUIT Trial
Investigators. Inhibition of Platelet
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa with Eptifibatide in Patients with Acute Coronary
Syndromes. N Engl J
Md 8-13-98;339:436-444.
The
IMPACT-II Investigators. Randomised
placebo-controlled
trial of effect of eptifibatide on complications of percutaneous
coronary
intervention: IMPACT-II. Lancet 1997;349:1422-1428.
The PRISM-PLUS Study Investigators. Inhibition of
the
platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with tirofiban in unstable
angina
and non-Qwave myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998;338:l488-l489.
The PRISM Study Investigators. A comparison of
aspirin
plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina. N
Engl
J Med 1998;338:l498-1505.
The
RESTORE Investigators. Effects of Platelet
Glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa blockade with Tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients
with unstable angina or acute
myocardial infarction undergoing
coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1997;96: 1445-1453.
The
CAPTURE Investigators. Randomized
placebo-controlled
trial of abciximab before and during coronary intervention in
refractory
unstable angina. Lancet 1997;349:1429-1435
The CAPTURE Study Investigators. Benefit of
Abciximab
in Patients with Refractory Unstable Angina in Relation to Serum
Troponin T Levels, N
Engl J Med 1999;340:l623-l629.
The
EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal
antibody directed
against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk
coronary
angioplasty. NEnglJMed 1994;330:956-96l.
The EPILOG Investigators.
Platelet glycoprotein llb/lla
receptor
blockade
and low-dose heparin
during percutaneous
coronary
revascularization. N
Engl J Med 1997;336:l689-1696./httpdocs/cajud/heart
The EPISTENT Investigators. Randomized
placebo-controlled
and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of
coronary stenting with use of
platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa
blockade. Lancet 1998;352:87-92.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Clinical Leaders
Ralph
Brindis, MD, MPH; Cardiology, San Francisco
Eleanor Levin, MD; Cardiology,
Santa Clara
Guideline Team
Sue
Flynn, RN; Santa Clara
Ken
Linsky, Pharm.D.;
Pharmacy, San Francisco
Tom
Padgett, MD; Emergency,
San Francisco
Michael
Petru, MD; Cardiology,
San Francisco
Bill
Plautz, MD; Emergency,
South San Francisco
Project
Management
Jay
Krishnaswamy, MBA; TPMG Department of Quality
and
Utilization
Reviewers
Nancy
Batmale, RN, MS; TPMG Department of Quality
and
Utilization
Roger
Baxter, MD; Medicine,
Oakland
Mark
Beck, RN, MSN; Nursing,
East Bay
Diane
Craig, MD; HBS, Santa
Clara
Charlotte
P. Edwards, R; TPMG
Department of Quality and
Utilization
Edward
Fischer, MD;
Cardiology, South San Francisco
Russ Granich, MD; HBS, Hayward
Pansy Kwong, MD; Medicine,
Oakland
Keith E
Palmer, MD; HBS, San.
Francisco
Pankaj
Patel, MD; Emergency,
Sacramento
Philip
Lee, MD; Cardiology,
Santa Clara
Lou
Lehman, MD; HBS, San
Francisco
Cathlene
Richmond, Pharm.D.;
Drug lnformation/Professional
Services
John
Rochat, MD;
Hematology/Oncology, Santa Rosa
James Scillian, MD; Pathology,
Stockton
Christina
Shih, MD; Emergency,
San Francisco
Dot
Snow, MPH; TPMG Department
of Quality and Utilization
Jennifer
Torresen, MPH;
Regional Health Education
Abdul
Wali, MD, HBS; Walnut
Creek
Cheryl
Wybomy, RN, MPH; TPMG
Department of
Quality
and Utilization
Editing
& Graphic Design
Linda
Bine; TPMG Communications
Gail
Holan; Curvey Graphic
Design
CONTACT INFORMATION
Kaiser Permanente Northern
California
TPMG
Department of Quality and
Utilization
1800
Harrison Street, 4th Floor
Oakland,
CA 94612
510-987-2950
or tie-line
8-427-2950
To
obtain more information
about KPNC Clinical Practice
Guidelines, printed copies, or permission to reproduce any portion,
please contact the TPMG Dept.
of Quality & Utilization,
or send an e-mail message to clinical
guidelines@kp.org
KPNC
Clinical Practice Guidelines can be viewed
on-line
on the Kaiser Permanente Northern California intranet at
http://cl.kp.org
This website is accessible
only from the Kaiser Permanente
computer network.
Disclaimer
The Permanente Medical Group
(TPMG) Clinical Practice
Guidelines have been developed to assist clinicians by providing an
analytical framework for the
evaluation and treatment
of selected common problems encountered in patients. These guidelines
are
not intended
to establish a
protocol for all patients
with a particular condition. While the guidelines provide one approach
to
evaluating a
problem, clinical
conditions may vary significantly
from individual to individual. Therefore, the clinician must exercise
independent
judgment
and make decisions
based upon the situation
presented. While great care has been taken to assure the accuracy of
the
information
presented,
the reader is
advised that TPMG cannot be
responsible for continued currency of the information, for any errors
or
omissions in
this
guideline, or for any
consequences arising from
its use.
Copyright
2000 The
Permanente Medical Group, Inc
Home
BACK TO
KAISER PERMANENTE DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT DOCUMENTS INDEX
|