In
Copyright Since September 11,
2000
This
web site is
in no manner
affiliated with any Kaiser entity and the for profit Permanente
Permission
is granted to mirror this web site -
Please acknowledge where the material was obtained.
Link
for Translation of the Kaiser Papers
ABOUT US |
CONTACT
|
MCRC
Why the
thistle is used as a logo on these web pages.
Custom Search
kaiserpapers.com/jstein
Dr. Wild,
You
and
Kaiser have invited patient anger in a hundred ways and should not be
surprised when someone can articulate it against you:
1. Kaiser, for example, legally lied that they had lost track of you
when at that time you were simply in another Kaiser location across the
San Francisco Bay; once the lies start to roll life gets complex;
2. Kaiser DOES do a lot of research without consents because it is such
a closed system and so expert at changing medical records after the
fact;
3. Residents at your stage of training there are often building resumes
of complex procedures toward the goal of early Board Certification;
supervision at Kaiser is terrible at all levels - the state once
finding janitors ("care partners") answering ER call buttons pushed by
patients in trouble;
4. Kaiser's loss of the pathology material in this case has made your
"cancer" cure claim a little hard to accept; what do they have to hide?
5. Kaiser's Arbitration System is so sick and unfair that your "Day in
Court" invitation is simply the bravado of someone who is bringing a
machine gun to a pop gun duel; and as the "records" will themselves be
spoiled, nothing will occur but more lies;
6. You are, no doubt, a Permanente Partner by now and counting on the
growth of your millionaire's pension at the end of 20 years of denying
care; at the same time you will lose this pension if you do not testify
to the Kaiser Plan (who is paying for your defense) legal strategy;
7. Kaiser Permanente starts with the national lie that it is non-profit
or "not for profit" when, in fact, your very retirement gold has to be
"earned" within the profits of Permanente - some $1 billion in 2007;
8. This HMO is a very sick puppy and only persists because of its 75%
base in Kaiser-fornia; it has left New England, New York, North
Carolina, Texas, Missouri, Kansas, etc. because the states were not so
willing to be Enablers to all the deceit;
9. As to your "mailed patient surveys," what possible patient on the
planet would be critical of a surgeon who might have to operate on
their face and neck? (Internally, Kaiser admits in writing
that
its "word of mouth" is bad which is why $45,000,000 in Thrive ads are
needed just to try to hang on to enrollment);
10. Kaiser refuses to debate any of this online and people continue to
get hurt, so the alternative opinion Web sites will only grow - perhaps
helping Kaiser lose 30,000 patients last year;
11. The patient in question will, no doubt, be very angry at me for
responding as she has better command of the details - my involvement
not being recent; but you come at many of us as well who are only
making Kaiser transparent as a non-paid public service.
12. Finally, as to your public (and wrong) diagnosis of a patient to
have a mental illness, you really should have vetted this with the
Kaiser legal department, for this alone might be a (CEM) career ending
move;
13.
Only the fact that the California Medical Board uses a
disproportionately high number of Permanente "experts" and Kaiser's
second in charge - Dr. Crosson's wife and Dr. Pearl's second in command
of TPMG - was just added to the Medical Board will save you from the
expected and appropriate wrath from above.
Charles Phillips, MD - former Permanente physician