In Copyright Since September 11, 2000. This web site isn't affiliated with, and doesn't rep­re­sent, any Kaiser entity, including but not limited to Permanente. This is instead a public interest nom­in­a­tive use site. Permission is granted to mirror this web site under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Please acknowledge where material was obtained.

|  History  |  Purpose  | Contact  |

kaiserpapers.com/legalstuff/ Source:  Kansas City Star  Date:  03/17/2001  Document ID:  AA20010319030007942  Citation Information:  p. C1  Author(s):  Julius A Karash --------------------------------------

Area phy­si­cians sue Kaiser Class-action case stems from HMO's decision to leave Kansas City area

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Three phy­si­cians who formerly practiced with Kaiser Permanente have sued the health maintenance organ­i­za­tion, claiming it cheated doctors out of money as part of its plan to leave the Kansas City area.

Kaiser, which is based in Oakland, Calif., announced in January that it planned to close its four Kansas City area medical offices and sell most of its membership contracts to Coventry Health Care of Kansas Inc. Kaiser expects to complete that agreement, which involves about 425 layoffs, this spring. Financial terms of the transaction have not been disclosed. 

The lawsuit against Kaiser was filed as a class action earlier this month in Johnson County District Court by phy­si­cians Herbert J. Waxman, Steven Warlick and Jeffrey Wall. 

The three formerly practiced with, and held shares in, a Kaiser physician affiliate known as Permanente Medical Group of Mid- America. The suit was filed on behalf of every physician who ever held shares in that group. 

"The lawsuit will not affect our transaction with Coventry," said Gerard Grimaldi, vice president of strategy and human resources for Kaiser's Kansas City area operations. 

"We continue to expect to finalize the sale with Coventry this spring and assure a smooth transition for our members," Grimaldi said. "It is regrettable that these three phy­si­cians, who left the medical group last year, felt compelled to make these allegations. We deny the substance of these allegations." 

The three phy­si­cians contend that Kaiser decided in 1999 to leave the Kansas City area and began at that time to take actions to implement that decision. 

For example, the suit contends that Kaiser misrepresented its financial situation to Permanente Medical Group shareholders last year in order to persuade the Permanente board to close two clinics and transfer 15,000 patients to another group of clinics. 

It also contends that Kaiser subsequently arranged for other medical groups to replace Permanente shareholder-phy­si­cians, resulting in the loss of their jobs and the loss of value in their shares, as part of the planned liquidation of the Permanente group. 

The lawsuit claims that the Kansas City area Kaiser health plan and its national parent organ­i­za­tion "conspired with each other, through the fraudulent representations ... for purposes of weakening and liquidating PMG (Permanente Medical Group) so as to enable the defendants to sell the HMO and thereby avoid any payment or benefit" to Permanente. 

Ronald Gold, a Mission attorney representing the doctors, said that when Kaiser has left other markets, the medical practice has been sold at the same time as the HMO. The difference in this case is that the medical practice is being liquidated with no com­pen­sa­tion to the phy­si­cians, he said. 

The plaintiffs are seek­ing a jury trial to determine what share of the proceeds are due to the Permanente shareholder-phy­si­cians and to determine whether the Kansas City area Kaiser plan made improper payments to its parent organ­i­za­tion. 

- To reach Julius A. Karash, health-care reporter, call (816) 234- 7728 or send e-mail to jkarash@kcstar.com 

Credit: The Kansas City Star 

Copyright Kansas City Star Company Mar 17, 2001

©2001 Bell & Howell Information & Learning Services; All Rights Reserved. Only fair use, as provided by the United States copyright law, is permitted. Bell & Howell Learning & Information Services makes no warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness or timelines of the Publications or the records they contain, or any warranty, express or implied, including any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not be liable for damages of any kind or lost profits or other claims related to them or their use.  

Portions of above Copyright © 1997-2002, divine, inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Service.  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------  

kaiserpapers.com kaiserpapers.com/legalstuff/