This story is taken from News at sacbee.com.
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/4736108p-5752030c.html
Kaiser
settles family's lawsuit parents blame the
hospital for their son's permanent disability after birth.
By Ramon Coronado --
Bee Staff Writer - (Published
October 10, 2002)
A Kaiser hospital in Sacramento has agreed to pay
$2.25 million to settle
a lawsuit alleging its staff neglected to tell a Carmichael couple
their
newborn son had a treatable medical condition that later injured him
permanently.
On Jan. 12, 1997, routine tests showed Carl and
Anthea London's baby
had low blood sugar levels, but they were allowed to take him home 24
hours
after his birth at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center on Morse
Avenue.
The following day baby Michael suffered seizures
and was readmitted
to the hospital.
He later was diagnosed with nesidioblastosis, a
disease of the pancreas.
But by that time, brain damage had occurred, according to Sacramento
Superior
Court documents.
Today, Michael is 5, legally blind, suffers from a
permanent developmental
disability, has diabetes and still experiences seizures.
Kaiser officials declined to comment Wednesday on
the settlement, which
was signed by a judge the day before.
The bulk of the $2.25 million that Kaiser agreed
to pay is for medical
expenses and the loss of expected wages, with $250,000 for what is
commonly
known as "pain and suffering."
As a condition of the settlement, the London
family said they were barred
from discussing details of the case. Their San Francisco attorney, John
Echeverria, also declined to comment.
But according to one legal expert, the settlement
may be lower than
it would have been because of a state law passed more than 20 years ago
that places a cap on non-economic damages.
"Anyone injured like this is going to be feeling
pain and suffering
for a lifetime," said Lawrence Levine, a professor at McGeorge School
of
Law.
"A 20-year-old cap on pain and suffering is
limiting recovery to a dollar
value based on the mid-1970s. Someone is being shortchanged here,"
Levine
said.
Aside from Michael's injuries, which limit his
learning abilities to
a boy half his age, court records show he also may live a shortened
life.
"As a result of his multiple medical difficulties,
the probability is
that Michael will have some limitation of life expectancy," said Jerome
P. Mednick, a child neurologist who evaluated the boy for the suit.
According to Mednick, Anthea London had a normal
pregnancy and there
were no signs of complications at birth.
The infant weighed 10 pounds 8 ounces and his
blood was tested for sugar
levels because of his large size, court records said.
"Carl and Anthea London were not informed of the
consequences of the
low blood sugar levels that Kaiser had detected," court papers said.
Mednick reported that Michael's daily routine now
calls for blood sugar
checks six times a day. He has insulin with his breakfast and his blood
is last tested before he goes to sleep, the doctor said.
Michael walks with a cane and has difficulty with
fine motor skills.
He can't hold a pencil or draw a vertical or horizontal line, Mednick
said.
Citing his "visual problems and probable or
possible difficulties,"
Mednick wrote that Michael "will certainly be able to learn, but this
in
conjunction with his seizure disorder will make employability as an
adult
suspect and probably unlikely."
Levine said victims like Michael show why
California's pain and suffering
cap should be reevaluated. The $250,000 cap translates into less than
$84,000
of today's dollar, he said.
"The solution is to raise the cap to an index that
is closer to today's
cost of living," Levine said. But such a change is not expected anytime
soon, he added.
The cap originally was enacted in 1975 after
doctors and their insurance
companies complained that the state's trial lawyers were putting them
out
of business with runaway medical malpractice lawsuits.
Since then, legislation has been proposed nearly
every year to amend
the cap, but all the proposals have died, Levine said.
"With every passing day victims are getting less
and less, but changing
things is a real controversy because you have trial lawyers on one side
and the doctors' insurers on the other," Levine said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
About the Writer
---------------------------
The Bee's Ramon Coronado can be reached at (916)
321-1191 or rcoronado@sacbee.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From The Sacramento Bee At:
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/4736108p-5752030c.html
This article is protected by copyright and should
not be printed or
distributed for anything except personal use.
The Sacramento Bee, 2100 Q St., P.O. Box 15779, Sacramento, CA 95852
Phone: (916) 321-1000
kaiserpapers.com
|